Coca-Cola is teaching registered dietitians how to combat “urban myths” and how to correct nutrition misinformation believed by parents. Many parents have this harebrained idea that fluoride, artificial colors, sugar, and fast food aren’t safe or healthy for their children.

The Commission on Dietetic Registration of the ADA has approved an educational program by the oxymoronic Coca-Cola Company Beverage Institute for Health and Wellness. State propped dietitians will receive continuing professional credits to show parents how they are operating out of an observational bias that stems from thinking they see a connection between their child’s behavior and the substance and believing its their responsibility, not the government’s to keep their kids healthy.

Take the quiz yourself to find out what the program is about and see if you would make a good dietitian from Coke’s viewpoint. How did you score? What did you think? Can we say loaded questions?

Coke’s program “When Urban Myths, Opinions, Parental Perceptions & Evidence Collide” is based on very specific, outdated studies (most from the 80s and 90s), and FDA approvals.

The ADA is gaining a monopoly in the area of nutrition. The Nevada bill to criminalize naturopathy passed and it included a statement that only registered dietitians can practice “dietetics” which means nutrition assessment, evaluation, diagnosis, counseling, intervention, monitoring and treatment. All things that nutritionists are supposed to practice. Read on to see what you can do to keep New York’s ADA bill from rushing through.

Is it any wonder the ADA teaches its dietitians how to keep people ill when it is literally sponsored by junk food companies like Coca-cola, PepsiCo, and Hershey’s which has its own center for health and nutrition?

~Health Freedoms

Related:

Search Aspartame Articles

http://healthfreedoms.org/2009/09/23/food-industry-is-now-calling-j...

http://healthfreedoms.org/2009/08/11/just-two-cans-of-fizzy-drink-a...

http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/03/31/food-coloring-linked-to-adhd-d...

Dietitians Are Buying Coke’s Line: Sugar, Fluoride, Artificial Colors are SAFE for Children!

We wish we could say we are surprised. Registered dietitians are now being given formal education by the Coca-Cola Company on how safe its ingredients are.

The credentialing arm of the American Dietetic Association, the Commission on Dietetic Registration (CDR), has approved a program created by the The Coca-Cola Company Beverage Institute f....This covers what it calls “urban myths” about the safety of food ingredients. Participating in this program will earn registered dietitians Continuing Professional Education unit credits.

“Children’s Dietary Recommendations: When Urban Myths, Opinions, Parental Perceptions & Evidence Collide,” tells dietitians that fluoride, sugar, artificial colors and nonnutritive sweeteners have been “carefully examined for their effects on children’s health, growth, and development.” The presenter, Dr. Ronald Kleinman, “explores prevalent misconceptions about these food ingredients” and suggests ways the dietitian can help quell unnecessary “concern among parents about their children’s health.”

At first glance, Dr. Kleinman should know what he is talking about. He is physician-in-chief at Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, chief of the Pediatric Gastrointestinal and Nutrition Unit, and Associate Professor of Pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. Couldn’t sound better, could it? But he has also received a great deal of money from industry sources—like artificial infant formula manufacturers Mead Johnson and Nestle Ltd. His study on optimal duration of breastfeeding was funded by Gerber Products. He also served as a paid expert witness for Gerber when they were sued for deceptive advertising. And he contributed to a brochure intended for children entitled “Variety’s Mountain” produced by the Sugar Association.

Now he’s being sponsored by the Coca-Cola Company and telling dietitians that the ingredients in Coke which everyone is alarmed about are safe. The dietitians, in turn, will be telling parents that their fears are unfounded, and Coke can sell more Coke to kids.

Program materials include gems like “[a] majority of studies so far have not found a link between sugar and behavior in children generally or children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.” This is certainly news to us, since we have seen many studies that say the opposite. Apparently the dietitians are to teach us that any connection between artificial colors and neurotoxicity, or fears of the dangers of fluoride, are imaginary and come from hysterical (or at least unduly concerned) parents.

As we reported recently, sugar and artificial sweeteners are anything but safe. Fluoride poses a significant risk to the kidneys. And commonly used food dyes pose risks which include hyperactivity in children, cancer (in animal studies), and allergic reactions. Even the Center for Science in the Public Interest, an organization that supports nuking food, agrees with this. And the British government and European Union have taken actions that are virtually ending the use of dyes throughout Europe.

The ADA is sponsored by the soda and junk food industries—which we feel greatly tarnishes the organization’s credibility. And you may recall that the ADA has mounted a state-by-state campaign to make sure that its Commission is the only one which will be accepted as a credentialing body for both registered dietitians and nutritionists.

There are, of course, significant philosophical differences between nutritionists and die...—they represent two different fields of study and practice. By accepting only a single credentialing agency—one run by the dietitians, not nutritionists—state boards are establishing a “one-size-fits-all” standard which removes all competition, essentially handing the ADA a government mandated monopoly over nutritional therapy.

Unfortunately, the Nevada bill we told you about last month passed both the Assembly and the Senate and was signed by the governor on June 5th. While some amendments were made, the most troubling parts of the bill still remain: only registered dietitians can practice “dietetics,” which is defined by the law to include nutrition assessment, evaluation, diagnosis, counseling, intervention, monitoring and treatment—everything that a good nutritionist does and should do.

We also told you about an ADA bill in New York, S.3556. The state’s Senate Finance Committee met on June 13 and decided to pass the bill to the Rules Committee so that it could be considered on the Senate floor. They are trying to rush these bills through, because next week the Assembly is scheduled to finish its work for the year, unless the chair calls a special session in the fall. Please click on our New York Action Alert here.

The ADA’s power grab is a complete travesty. We will keep fighting it state by state until we restore competition in nutritional counseling and stop gagging PhD-trained nutritionists who don’t become dietitians.

Sources:

http://www.anh-usa.org/dietitians-are-buying-cokes-line/

http://www.anh-usa.org/how-sweet-it-isnt-cutting-through-the-hype-a...

http://www.anh-usa.org/fluoride%E2%80%94good-for-the-teeth-but-bad-...

http://hosted2.ap.org/apdefault/APNews/Article_2011-06-06-HealthBea...

http://www.eatright.org/corporatesponsors/